Sunday, September 13, 2009

don't tread on me

Talk about one cool group of people – the post-Kulturkamph Catholics in Germany had it going on. I was just amused during Anderson’s “The Kulturkamph and the Course of German History” that this supposedly ignorant, illiterate and un-autonomous group was able to repeatedly puzzle and anger the upper-class, educated, and politically savvy individuals attempting to control the outcomes of elections. I found it humorous that the more liberal parties, after advocating and receiving more universal suffrage, get angry when local Catholic majorities use their votes to outvote liberal sentiments. All of a sudden they no longer seem pleased with more universal suffrage. Angry at the Catholics’ densely uniform voting patterns, Wilhelm Wehrenpfennig attributes their success to their “dumbness.” What was really dumb, however, was the amount of attention and fear-mongering that rose up over this new Catholic threat. For example, Anderson mentions how in the elections of Upper Silesia in 1871 the Center Party (supported by Catholics) only “garnered a mere 27%” of the votes in a regency where Catholics made up more than 90% of the population.” All the attention of the election, however, went to one small district’s results, Pless-Rybnik, where little known esthetic Father Eduard Muller was able to defeat a much wealthier, cultured, incumbent, prince/duke. Round of applause ladies and gentlemen for Father Ed Muller. What I loved was that he beat the prince at his own game – pretend not to care about politics, let natural deference play the deciding factor, etc. He was essentially a hermit, and he beat the prince. Awesome. Further evidence for the coolness of this group of Catholics in Germany at this time is their non-loyalty to papal decision. No one, not even Bismarck (or the Pope apparently), can put a finger on these guys to control them – they flow in their own current.

3 comments:

  1. You are right. The Catholics of Germany were a group that is very interesting. What interests me is the fact that you pointed out. Not even the Pope was able to control this group of Catholic voters. That point is ironic to me, for that is the reason that most people feared the Catholics for was their seemingly blind obedience to the Pope over any other authority. It was this wild card group that is the perfect example that Catholics will vote as they see fit not as they are told.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very interesting indeed. You could not put this group of people in a box! They were a collection of voters first, and a group of catholics second; so they were voters who happened to be catholic rather than catholics who chose to vote in political affairs. They picked a candidate based on preference (Father Muller) instead of someone who "deserved" to be in charge (the Duke).

    ReplyDelete
  3. You have totally hit on one of the reasons why I find the Kulturkampf so intriguing and interesting. I think this same phenomenon exists in modern politics as well: parties claim to represent the people until the people vote against them and then the people are either ignorant or were 'duped' by the opposition. Either way, then as now, politicians seem to believe that people are incapable of recognizing their own self-interest and need the educated to inform them.

    ReplyDelete